What is a medical blog? Archive with commentary

Blogs are growing a lot more slowly. But expert/specialist blogs still thrive, according to The Economist: http://goo.gl/s1pv .

There are still relatively few medical blogs, for example, there's little content overlap among the several cardiology blogs. Compare and contrast this to tech blogs.

Discussion:

@kevinmd: Are blogs dying? I agree with this take: http://goo.gl/s1pv

My response (@DrVes): Blogs will not die but many will move (or start) on Facebook.

@kevinmd: Agree. Facebook, and Twtter to an extent, provide much lower barriers to content generation than blogs.

@DrVes: "Fame or Influence - which would you prefer as a blogger?" http://goo.gl/sP7J - My blog is my archive, I'm happy if readers find it useful.

@sandnsurf: "Fame or Influence - which would you prefer as a blogger?" Agree, blog simply online archive with commentary.

@DrVes: If you want to write a blog, you can do it on your own, for free. There is no need for blog conglomerates http://bit.ly/d5WPrI and http://bit.ly/95b5o0

References:

2 comments:

  1. Ves,
    You raise a potentially valuable discussion here about the nature and value of medical blogs. But the cited Economist article is nearly a year old. Does that matter? Is that sort of detail worth mentioning in a post?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for the comment, and the good point about timing.

    In this particular case, the conclusion is the same: "Blogs are growing a lot more slowly. But expert/specialist blogs still thrive"

    The Twitter discussion is also from 6-7 months ago.

    I schedule the posts in advance, sometimes 3-5 months in the future. If the info is outdated by that time, I often elect not to publish it.

    ReplyDelete